gear is queued for analysis. Crawling candidates and ranking them takes a few minutes. This page updates itself when the list exists — you can also come back later.
What is known so far comes from the other direction:
These projects were analysed and named gear among their alternatives. The relationship is not symmetric — how gear rates them is a separate judgement, made when gear is analysed in its own right.
calls gear “choose when you want a lightweight, composable web framework with a small API surface and low dependency footprint, though the community is smaller than Echo's.”
High performance, minimalist Go web framework
calls gear “Choose if you want a lightweight composable web service framework with a framework-style API and do not require large community support.”
lightweight, idiomatic and composable router for building Go HTTP services
calls gear “choose for a lightweight, composable web service framework that is easy to extend.”
A powerful framework for faster, easier, and more efficient project development.
calls gear “Use gear when you want a lightweight, composable HTTP service framework rather than a full microservice framework.”
A cloud-native Go microservices framework with cli tool for productivity.