calls faygo “choose when you want a batteries-included Go web framework with auto binding, though it is several years stale.”
A high performance HTTP request router that scales well
faygo is queued for analysis. Crawling candidates and ranking them takes a few minutes. This page updates itself when the list exists — you can also come back later.
What is known so far comes from the other direction:
These projects were analysed and named faygo among their alternatives. The relationship is not symmetric — how faygo rates them is a separate judgement, made when faygo is analysed in its own right.
calls faygo “choose when you want a batteries-included Go web framework with auto binding, though it is several years stale.”
A high performance HTTP request router that scales well
calls faygo “an older Go web framework with auto-binding handler style; choose if you prefer that model, but it is unmaintained (3.5 years).”
High performance, minimalist Go web framework
calls faygo “Choose faygo if you are supporting a legacy Go service already written on it; it hasn't been updated in years and shouldn't be chosen for new work.”
Go HTTP framework with high-performance and strong-extensibility for building micro-services.